Conditional sentences

A. Brent Hudson (
Tue, 07 May 96 12:21:11 -0500

Perhaps someone can clear this up for me. I have always followed Brooks &
Winbery's classification of conditional sentences; however, I have
encountered a difficulty and need some help. Smyth notes that a simple
condition (protasis=EI + pres. or pf. ind. / apodosis = pres. or pf. ind. or
equivalent) states a "supposition with no implication as to its reality or
probability." This is easy enough; however, I thought this "simple
condition" fell under the general rubric of a "first class" condition which
B&W defines as assuming the reality of the protatic condition. Smyth notes
that the condition may be real or impossible; it doesn't matter since the
point is the connection between protasis and apodosis rather than the
reality or unreality of the condition (2298b) The passage I am working on is
Jn 15:18. According to B&W this is a "first class condition." According to
Smyth, it is a "simple condition." My original concern was simply what
difference GINWSKETE as either indic. or imptv would make to the condition.
Now, I am just confused.

Simply put, Is Jn 15.18 a simple condition (thus real or unreal = contextual
) or first class condition (action assumed to be real)?

Any help would be appreciated.


 A. Brent Hudson 
 Graduate Program in Religious Studies	
 McMaster University,			
 Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA	
 "Everything used to be so clear"