Re: _The Formation of Q_
Stephen C. Carlson (email@example.com)
Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:48:46 -0400
At 10:59 8/25/96 -0600, Jack Kilmon wrote:
>Stephen C. Carlson wrote:
>> I suppose a good control for Kloppenborg's method would be to extract
>> Mark from the contents of Matthew (assuming that Mark and Luke are not
>> extant). Would all the fulfillment quotations be put in a secondary
> If I catch your meaning correctly here, Stephen, maybe a
>reconstruction of the missing ending on Mark (after 16:8) could be
>extracted from Matthew if one uses the Markan style in the translation.
No, I was thinking of being able to extract Mark, Q, and M from Matthew
using K's analysis.
Stephen C. Carlson : Poetry speaks of aspirations,
firstname.lastname@example.org : and songs chant the words.
http://www.mindspring.com/~scarlson/ : -- Shujing 2.35