Re: Gramcord & Accordance

Walt McFall (ana@net1.nw.com.au)
Sat, 30 Nov 1996 18:31:53 +0000

Andrew wrote (in a message that came over as "bad" to me):

> X-Nvlenv-01Date-Posted: 30-Nov-1996 18:32:46 -0500; at TP.BAEA
> To: b-greek@virginia.edu
> Message-Id: <7772926201870370@-SMF->
> Subject: Gramcord & Accordance
> From: "KULIKOVSKY, Andrew" <AKULIKOV@baea.com.au>
> Date: 30 Nov 96 18:32:40 EST
> References: <7772926202870370@-SMF->
>
> Fellow Greeks,
>
> Just what exactly is the difference between Gramcord and
> Accordance? I assume they use the same databases, and they
> both use a window based user interface so the difference
> must be in the search engine....but why? And just how
> much better is Accordance than Gramcord? What does it do
> that Gramcord doesn't? I am considering buying the Gramcord
> teacher's CD because I am sick and tired of using Logos 2.0
> with its virtually useless morph search engine and its
> incredibly slow and cumbersome user interface - I'm sure it
> must have been designed by an accountant!
>
> cheers,
> Andrew
>
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Andrew S. Kulikovsky B.App.Sc(Hons) MACS

Any help in this area would be appreciated!!!

Thanks.

Salute'

Walt ana@net1.nw.com.au
========================
Intellectual reparte
allows working minds
a field to play.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++