You may have, Ken, but it's hard to judge without having a text to
illustrate what you are referring to. Isn't this the author of Second
Maccabees? (or is it third?). My recollection, i it's what I'm thinking of,
is that it's pretty good Greek with a lot of words I found unfamiliar.
(a) It is quite possible to get lengthy strings of indirect discourse
wherein, if the subject of the infinitive doesn't change, the only verbs
you'll get will be additional infinitives. If I remember aright the work
you're reading, it starts with a lengthy letter recounting the events
establishing the Hannukah festival, but my memory may be wrong--in that,
there was just such a string of indirect discourse, as I recall.
(b) The standard rule for indirect discourse is that when the subject of
indirect discourse is identical with the subject of the introductory verb,
it is in the nominative and any modifiers are in the nominative. Just for
example:
He said that his enemies had done this to him
EFH TOUS ECQROUS TAUTA hEAUTWi POIHSAI (with subject accusative)
but
He said that he himself had done this to his enemies
EFH AUTOS TAUTA TOIS ECQROIS POIHSAI
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University
One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, USA 63130
(314) 935-4018
cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu OR cwc@oui.com
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/