[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wenham
- To: Carlton Winbery <winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net>
- Subject: Re: Wenham
- From: Paul Dixon - Ladd Hill Bible Church <pauld@iclnet.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 10:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: Mark Goodacre <goodacms@m4-arts.bham.ac.uk>, b-greek@virginia.edu
- In-Reply-To: <v01530500afb94eda4698@[206.103.79.155]>
On Tue, 3 Jun 1997, Carlton Winbery wrote:
> One of the real pleasures of my year in Oxford (83-84) was "eating" tea
> with John Wenham on Sunday afternoon fortnightly.
snip
> As to his Greek beginning grammar. As traditional grammars go, it is a
> good one and has been widely used among English students outside the US.
> There are two reasons, I think, why it has never been widely used in the
> US, maybe three. 1) Most teachers of Greek in the US have felt that
> accents, while not of primary importance, are important. I would add that
> for those Greek students I have taught, they seem to have less trouble with
> them if introduced to them at the very beginning. 2) Wenham's book is very
> traditional. For this type grammar, Machen has been hard to beat.
I began NT Greek with Goetchius. Later I taught using Machen, Kaufman,
and now Wenham. I prefer either Machen or Wenham for these reasons:
1) the books are Derek Kidner style (concise and to the point), 2) either
book is a complete unity; you don't need an additional workbook, 3)
Wenham's grammar is especially good because it has a beginning section on
English grammar (very helpful for those not up on their grammar) and a
superb set of indices containing vocab, summaries, dictionary, LUW chart,
etc.
Paul Dixon
References:
- Re: Wenham
- From: Carlton Winbery <winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net>