chicken liver at least has the benefit of being more in touch with the
"fleshly" material side of logos and does not connote a non-corporeal, non
substantial (in the philosophical sense of the term) idea such as "soul"
does!!!!
(though I must, it seems, go on the record as also opposing "chicken liver"
as a poor selection) :>)
Jim
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Jim West
Adjunct Professor of Bible,
Quartz Hill School of Theology
jwest@highland.net