Re: Looking For Newly Discovered MS of John
>Date: Tue, 14 Jun 94 14:44:04 PDT
>From: Vincent Broman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: Re: Looking For Newly Discovered MS of John
> [...] One epistle MS is dated by a few
>scholars to the end of the first century, also not a palimpsest.
If anyone is interested, the reference here is, I believe, to Kim's dating
of p46 --on purely paleographic grounds-- to c. 75-85CE (i.e. as opposed to
the "standard" dating of ~200CE). Some --e.g. Philip Comfort-- use this
dating as a basis for much of their work.
For the complete reference --and a number of arguments as to why this
dating is almost certainly incorrect-- please the discussion in the (new)
appendix to the 3rd edition of Bruce Metzger's _Text of the NT_.