Date: Tue, 19 Jul 1994 10:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
   From: David Coomler <davidco@nethost.multnomah.lib.or.us>


   One source suggests that the most likely (as that intended in the NT) is
   the crux immissa or "latin" cross, because of the inscription nailed above
   the head of Christ.  That is not entirely logical, however, because that
   would easily be possible on both the simple post and the "T"-shaped "Tau"
   cross.  The "Tau" cross seems to have been very prominent in the early
   years of Christianity, and as late as the time of Luther one finds many
   paintings showing either Christ or those crucified beside him placed upon
   a "Tau" cross.

Interesting.  As I remember, the grafitti on the propylaion of
Eleusis, which were scratched on its steps to keep its ``demons''
within the temple precinct, include Greek crosses (i.e. all 4 arms of
the cross of equal length) inscibed within circles.  It's possible
that these were meant to be chi's, but the arms were 90 degrees apart,
as in a cross, rather than at a smaller angle, as in a chi.

Bob Ingria

Follow-Ups: References: