Re: Q and Papias

On Sat, 29 Oct 1994, Larry Swain wrote:

> If Mark is using Matthew, 
> his use of Matthew is going to be conditioned on his ability to cut and 
> paste into his own work.  If that ability is puerile, then the result is 
> puerile.

If that were true, then one is hard-pressed to account for the survival of
a crude, later Mark in the presence of a more elegant and developed
earlier Matthew.  

(p.s. Is anyone subscribed to OT Hebrew, and if so, how did you do it?  I
am having trouble with the standard Listserv subscriber info).


Follow-Ups: References: