Re: John 1:1, Structure and Transl.
On Wed, 23 Nov 1994 Dvdmoore@aol.com wrote:
> Besides the foregoing, LOGOS should probably not be understood as "word"
> in the strictest sense of that term here. Recent discussion on this list has
> shown that LOGOS is very ample semantically, and many of its other meanings
> probably come closer to what John was expressing than "word" understood
Doesn't John's entire prologue make it pretty clear that the Word is Christ?
How many other meanings can there be in this context?
Upper Marlboro, MD