Search found 219 matches

by Peter Streitenberger
November 14th, 2017, 5:41 pm
Forum: Other
Topic: New Book on the Article
Replies: 30
Views: 7728

Re: New Book on the Article

Hope you are right, and if exceptions have arrived, I am open to hear more. At least I have not read sound linguistics from Porter, Campbell, Matthewson and now from what I scanned from Peters. Always disappointed. I would agree with the statement on it by Dan Wallace, after I could find his article...
by Peter Streitenberger
November 13th, 2017, 9:25 pm
Forum: Other
Topic: New Book on the Article
Replies: 30
Views: 7728

Re: New Book on the Article

A little more on the article with proper names, from page 295: The best way to illustrate this usage is to analyze a substantial portion of discourse in which the grounding of participants may be illustrated. First, consider a portion of the transfiguration of Jesus in Matt 17:1-4: Καὶ μεθ’ ἡμέρας ...
by Peter Streitenberger
November 13th, 2017, 11:18 am
Forum: Other
Topic: New Book on the Article
Replies: 30
Views: 7728

Re: New Book on the Article

I am not particularly interested, after reading the quotes, as nothing new is expected, the things I could read are well known and I doubt his idea of the article in regard to the rel. pronoun. When the data obviously is restricted to the New Testament, then the data is not sufficient to draw conclu...
by Peter Streitenberger
November 10th, 2017, 7:15 am
Forum: New Testament
Topic: Errors In Revelation?
Replies: 42
Views: 7002

Re: Errors In Revelation?

Randall, >The same is true for τὴν κιβωτὸν ἀντίμιμον. Fully feminine. Are you sure on that one? Could be but I`m not, have to check the class of this adjective, but which book I can consult, at first glance - is it irregular - and in reality feminine? Not sure, at least I. Why this? P. After a first...
by Peter Streitenberger
November 10th, 2017, 7:06 am
Forum: New Testament
Topic: Errors In Revelation?
Replies: 42
Views: 7002

Re: Errors In Revelation?

Ken, Randall and all interested, thanks, of course I know this, I know this, and the interpretation of the database is an interpretation and the morphology of that cases is not clear, as feminine and mas. are identical (as far as I recall, not having read what I wrote, I should have pointed towards ...
by Peter Streitenberger
November 8th, 2017, 8:54 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: Errors In Revelation?
Replies: 42
Views: 7002

Re: Errors In Revelation?

Very nice, Barry, thank you! Thanks for the further things to consider. As Christian I should sometimes direct a prayer towards above before submitting anything. Feel free to address what you want to, I am learning.
by Peter Streitenberger
November 8th, 2017, 8:40 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: Errors In Revelation?
Replies: 42
Views: 7002

Re: Errors In Revelation?

Adressing Randalls remark on the byz Text, I prefer: if the TON MEGAN were so erroneous at that point: Why then would the majority of scribes of the Greek MSS (ca. 60%, based on Hoskier's data) have changed a perfectly grammatical THN MEGALHN into the problematic TON MEGAN? - they wouldn't. or, why ...
by Peter Streitenberger
November 8th, 2017, 7:52 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: Errors In Revelation?
Replies: 42
Views: 7002

Re: Errors In Revelation?

Dear Randall, Barry and the rest of the band, thanks! I have to agree with your interpretation and it made me think over the whole issue and I hope to be able to think more clearly now. To add a further example in Flavius, unfortunately not completely clear to decide in Josephus is the following: Wa...
by Peter Streitenberger
November 8th, 2017, 12:27 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: Errors In Revelation?
Replies: 42
Views: 7002

Re: Errors In Revelation?

>Again, you repeat your assertions without interacting with the arguments. Additionally, can you provide any >examples outside the LXX which would support your claims? There was not one argument, counter example and so forth - so how to interact with something not present? I probably could find more...
by Peter Streitenberger
November 8th, 2017, 9:09 am
Forum: New Testament
Topic: Errors In Revelation?
Replies: 42
Views: 7002

Re: Errors In Revelation?

|clearly marked as such by the article, is then immediately modified by a masculine adjective It has always been all about that and that was proven and no counter example were given by you: τὴν ληνὸν was modified by the maskuline τὸν μέγαν, you have claimed that this is wrong or a solecism, without ...

Go to advanced search