Search found 121 matches

by Tony Pope
November 29th, 2017, 5:14 am
Forum: New Testament
Topic: κλωμενον in 1Cor. 11:24 is it unPauline?
Replies: 3
Views: 1005

Re: κλωμενον in 1Cor. 11:24 is it unPauline?

There are images on the Münster website http://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace but you would need to be registered in order to view Dabs1 (GA 0319). However, you could view the images of F (GA 010) and G (012) without registering. But is there anyway a problem in the syntax of τὸ σῶμα τὸ ...
by Tony Pope
November 21st, 2017, 4:01 am
Forum: New Testament
Topic: Rev 2:13 ο μαρτυς μου, ο πιστος [μου]?
Replies: 9
Views: 1880

Re: Rev 2:13 ο μαρτυς μου, ο πιστος [μου]?

The THGNT is up on the STEP Bible, somewhat hidden and hard to find. It is in ancient bibles menu at bottom under "other" and the apparatus is not currently available. David Instone-Brewer told me the apparatus wasn't supposed to be there but didn't tell me why. The SBLGNT apparatus covers similar ...
by Tony Pope
August 15th, 2017, 3:53 am
Forum: Syntax and Grammar
Topic: τοῦτ᾽ εστιν
Replies: 20
Views: 5792

Re: τοῦτ᾽ εστιν

Okay, then, it seems that in Rom 1.12 it's simply the δέ that signals that an element of correction is coming in the explanatory clause.
by Tony Pope
August 12th, 2017, 1:46 am
Forum: Syntax and Grammar
Topic: τοῦτ᾽ εστιν
Replies: 20
Views: 5792

Re: τοῦτ᾽ εστιν

Do you think there would be a difference in meaning between these two sentences (pretending, for the sake of argument, that the New Testament used both spellings)? τουτέστιν δέ συμπαρακληθῆναι ἐν ὑμῖν διὰ τῆς ἐν ἀλλήλοις πίστεως ὑμῶν τε καὶ ἐμοῦ. τοῦτο δέ ἐστιν συμπαρακληθῆναι ἐν ὑμῖν διὰ τῆς ἐν ἀλ...
by Tony Pope
August 10th, 2017, 5:00 am
Forum: Syntax and Grammar
Topic: τοῦτ᾽ εστιν
Replies: 20
Views: 5792

Re: τοῦτ᾽ εστιν

Note that δέ can divide τοῦτο ἐστιν, so it seems still to be thought of as two words here: τοῦτο δέ ἐστιν συμπαρακληθῆναι ἐν ὑμῖν διὰ τῆς ἐν ἀλλήλοις πίστεως ὑμῶν τε καὶ ἐμοῦ. Lightfoot draws a distinction between τοῦτ᾽ εστιν and τοῦτο δέ ἐστιν: "The difference is important. Τοῦτο δέ ἐστιν is corre...
by Tony Pope
July 31st, 2017, 6:00 am
Forum: Beginners Forum
Topic: Theos in the NT, esp John 1
Replies: 12
Views: 4500

Re: Theos in the NT, esp John 1

If you have the time and energy, I recommend this article: Jan Van der Watt & Chrys Caragounis, «A Grammatical Analysis of John 1,1», Filología Neotestamentaria 21 (2008) 91-138 The discussion of this verse starts on p. 110. Can be read online (but not downloaded) at: https://www.bsw.org/filologia-n...
by Tony Pope
July 13th, 2017, 6:03 am
Forum: Syntax and Grammar
Topic: John's Good Greek
Replies: 10
Views: 2078

Re: John's Good Greek

Perhaps this syntactical usage of μαρτυρία in the Apocalpse is at an idiolectic level, while the usage in the Gospel conforms to the broader standard usage. An article that may be helpful is Fred Mazzaferri, ' Marturia Iêsou Revisited.' BT 39.1 1988 114-122 Can be read online at http://www.ubs-tran...
by Tony Pope
April 27th, 2017, 12:06 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: RP2005 ψύχος and / or ψῦχος
Replies: 5
Views: 1416

Re: RP2005 ψύχος and / or ψῦχος

How does John 18:18 "ὅτι ψῦχος ἦν" make sense in the Greek then? [BDAG, ψῦχος "cold" (the English noun)] Apparently Greek idiom is different from English in that it uses the noun whereas we would use the adjective. I found the following on the Perseus site: Aristoph. Eccl. 535 ψῦχος γὰρ ἦν, ἐγὼ δὲ ...
by Tony Pope
April 27th, 2017, 6:53 am
Forum: New Testament
Topic: RP2005 ψύχος and / or ψῦχος
Replies: 5
Views: 1416

Re: RP2005 ψύχος and / or ψῦχος

There is no significance in the different accentuation. This appears to be an accidental inconsistency.

The TR and also Westcott & Hort's edition accent both places as ψύχος, while other 19th century editions, followed by the Nestle editions, use the classical accentuation ψῦχος for both places.

Go to advanced search