Does an accusative 'mean' this much?

Biblical Greek morphology and syntax, aspect, linguistics, discourse analysis, and related topics
Post Reply
Philip Arend
Posts: 61
Joined: October 14th, 2018, 1:15 am

Does an accusative 'mean' this much?

Post by Philip Arend »

Matt. 5:6 μακάριοι οἱ πεινῶντες καὶ διψῶντες τὴν δικαιοσύνην, ὅτι αὐτοὶ χορτασθήσονται.

James Boice comments that an accusative adds quite a strong amount of meaning...

"The significance of this point for interpreting the fourth beatitude lies in the fact that the normal Greek usage is entirely abandoned in this verse. Instead of the word “righteousness” occurring in the genitive, as it should, it occurs in the accusative. And the meaning is that the one who hungers and thirsts as Christ intends him to hunger and thirst must hunger, not after a partial or imperfect righteousness (either his own or God’s), but after the whole thing. He must long for a perfect righteousness, and this means, therefore, a righteousness equal to and identical with God’s."

How could an accusative import this meaning to the text? Is there such a stark difference between the use of genitive and accusative?
Barry Hofstetter
Posts: 2159
Joined: May 6th, 2011, 1:48 pm

Re: Does an accusative 'mean' this much?

Post by Barry Hofstetter »

Actually, with all due respect to Dr. Boice, I don't think so. There are other examples in Greek literature where διψάω takes the accusative, and context does not indicate anything like what Dr. Boice suggests. It's simply a synonymous alternative construction.
N.E. Barry Hofstetter, M.A., Th.M.
Ph.D. Student U of FL
Instructor of Latin
Jack M. Barrack Hebrew Academy
καὶ σὺ τὸ σὸν ποιήσεις κἀγὼ τὸ ἐμόν. ἆρον τὸ σὸν καὶ ὕπαγε.
Jason Hare
Posts: 951
Joined: June 2nd, 2011, 5:28 pm
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Contact:

Re: Does an accusative 'mean' this much?

Post by Jason Hare »

Barry Hofstetter wrote: May 18th, 2019, 7:05 am Actually, with all due respect to Dr. Boice, I don't think so. There are other examples in Greek literature where διψάω takes the accusative, and context does not indicate anything like what Dr. Boice suggests. It's simply a synonymous alternative construction.
LSJ specifically mentions that it appears with accusative and dative objects and with πρός and infinitives.

From διψάω in Diogenes:
metaph., δ. τινός thirst after a thing, Pi.N.3.6; ἐλευθερίας Pl.R.562c: later c. acc., δ. Χῖον Teles p.8 H.; φόνον APl.4.137 (Phil.); δικαιοσύνην Ev.Matt. 5.6; αἷμα J.BJ1.32.2; also δ. πρὸς τὸν θεόν LXXPs.41(42).2: c. dat., ὕδατι ib.Ex.17.3: c. inf., διψῶ χαρίζεσθαι ὑμῖν X.Cyr.5.1.1; ἀκρατῶς ἐδίψη οἴνου πίνειν Ael.VH2.41, etc.
Jason A. Hare
The Hebrew Café
Tel Aviv, Israel
Post Reply

Return to “Greek Language and Linguistics”