If the son who left is escribed as the ἄσωτος υἱός. What would the son who stayed be referred to as? σώφρων "sensible"? φείδωλος "frugal" / "sparing"?Luke 15:13 wrote:Καὶ μετ’ οὐ πολλὰς ἡμέρας συναγαγὼν ἅπαντα ὁ νεώτερος υἱὸς ἀπεδήμησεν εἰς χώραν μακράν, καὶ ἐκεῖ διεσκόρπισεν τὴν οὐσίαν αὐτοῦ, ζῶν ἀσώτως.
Luke 15:13 etc. ἄσωτος υἱός and ???? υἱός
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Luke 15:13 etc. ἄσωτος υἱός and ???? υἱός
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Re: Luke 15:13 etc. ἄσωτος υἱός and ???? υἱός
FWTW, In looking for language to speak about this parable of the prodigal son, my third preference for descibing the elder son who stayed to look after the family property is πιστός "faithful" / "trustworthy".
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
Re: Luke 15:13 etc. ἄσωτος υἱός and ???? υἱός
The problem here, it seems to me, is that the elder brother has lots of virtues (would probably make a good church officer?), he's "sober-minded" (yes, σώφρων), "dependable" (yes, πιστός), "hard-working" (ἐργαστικός), "a good citizen" (χρηστός). Perhaps he's looked up to by others in the village, perhaps envied -- in both a good sense and a bad sense. Some might also say that he is "smug" or "boring". It might be worth looking through Theophrastus' Characters for a description of him as a discernible type of figure, as is the younger brother described as ζῶν ἀσώτως. It seems to me, however, that what make it difficult to talk about these figures in Jesus' parables is that we recognize them as "types" not by the nouns and adjectives used to describe them, but rather by the verbal expressions that tell us of their behavior. I remember being taught (FWIW!) that whereas English-speakers make the most of nouns (especially abstract nouns) and adjectives to describe people, ancient Greek preferred to rely more upon verbs to do that. That may be an overgeneralization, but there's something to the notion of paying more attention to what people do than to what they say about themselves or others. Also, it seems that Jesus' parables --- especially the Lucan ones -- frequently call attention to the flaws in the virtuous and the good instincts of bad-behavors.Stephen Hughes wrote:If the son who left is escribed as the ἄσωτος υἱός. What would the son who stayed be referred to as? σώφρων "sensible"? φείδωλος "frugal" / "sparing"? ... FWIW, In looking for language to speak about this parable of the prodigal son, my third preference for descibing the elder son who stayed to look after the family property is πιστός "faithful" / "trustworthy".Luke 15:13 wrote:Καὶ μετ’ οὐ πολλὰς ἡμέρας συναγαγὼν ἅπαντα ὁ νεώτερος υἱὸς ἀπεδήμησεν εἰς χώραν μακράν, καὶ ἐκεῖ διεσκόρπισεν τὴν οὐσίαν αὐτοῦ, ζῶν ἀσώτως.
οὔτοι ἀπ’ ἀρχῆς πάντα θεοὶ θνητοῖς ὑπέδειξαν,
ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ ζητέοντες ἐφευρίσκουσιν ἄμεινον. (Xenophanes, Fragment 16)
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ ζητέοντες ἐφευρίσκουσιν ἄμεινον. (Xenophanes, Fragment 16)
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Re: Luke 15:13 etc. ἄσωτος υἱός and ???? υἱός
In narrative composition yes, I agree there is a difference in idiom between Greek in English, more or less following the style we see in Thucydides, but in descriptive texts - involving abstractions - such as the lists of good and bad characteristics that people have, there are plenty of adjectives.
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: May 20th, 2014, 10:13 am
- Location: west coast of Canada
Re: Luke 15:13 etc. ἄσωτος υἱός and ???? υἱός
I do think Carl gets to the heart of it here. Adjectives applied in the early part of the narrative are proven by the flow of the story itself to be flawed. Although the father gets very little ‘ink’ until the latter part of the narrative it turns out that the story is really about him, and both of the sons are cads. The apparent virtues of the elder - “πιστός” … “ἐργαστικός” … “σώφρων” … “χρηστός”… φείδωλος - turn out to be, in him, no virtues at all.cwconrad wrote: It seems to me, however, that what make it difficult to talk about these figures in Jesus' parables is that we recognize them as "types" not by the nouns and adjectives used to describe them, but rather by the verbal expressions that tell us of their behavior. I remember being taught (FWIW!) that whereas English-speakers make the most of nouns (especially abstract nouns) and adjectives to describe people, ancient Greek preferred to rely more upon verbs to do that. That may be an overgeneralization, but there's something to the notion of paying more attention to what people do than to what they say about themselves or others. Also, it seems that Jesus' parables --- especially the Lucan ones -- frequently call attention to the flaws in the virtuous and the good instincts of bad-behavors.
The dynamics of the verbs reveal the younger son coming to recognize his need for the father, and the older son to be loveless and unforgiving. But there are no adjectives in the narrative to tell you that exactly, and that I thnk is the power of the narrative. The revelation of true character is revealed through the verbs, similar to Matt 21:28ff. The unwritten adjectives which the climax of the parable leaves you with for the brothers are μετανοῶν and ἀνέλεος / μὴ ἔχων ἀγάπην
γράφω μαθεῖν
Re: Luke 15:13 etc. ἄσωτος υἱός and ???? υἱός
What descriptive texts have you in mind? I haven't looked or thought about Longinus. I mentioned Theophrastus, and it occurs to me that Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics develops lists of virtuous behavior and corresponding excessive and deficient terms, but it's not clear to me what works you're thinking of. I confess that I have not at all looked at Greek patristic discussions of Biblical texts, but that might be a resource. One exception worth mentioning: 1 Cor 13 offers a number of adjectival descriptions of ἀγαπή, although it works much of its descriptive analysis through 3rd-person singular verbs.Stephen Hughes wrote:In narrative composition yes, I agree there is a difference in idiom between Greek in English, more or less following the style we see in Thucydides, but in descriptive texts - involving abstractions - such as the lists of good and bad characteristics that people have, there are plenty of adjectives.
οὔτοι ἀπ’ ἀρχῆς πάντα θεοὶ θνητοῖς ὑπέδειξαν,
ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ ζητέοντες ἐφευρίσκουσιν ἄμεινον. (Xenophanes, Fragment 16)
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ ζητέοντες ἐφευρίσκουσιν ἄμεινον. (Xenophanes, Fragment 16)
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
Re: Luke 15:13 etc. ἄσωτος υἱός and ???? υἱός
While I'll readily agree with the last paragraph, I don't think it's quite fair to refer to both the younger and older sons as "cads"; I'd prefer to say that they are, like most of us, flawed human beings who may be well-enough endowed with what are generally understood as virtues -- but something of fundamental importance is lacking, namely ἀγάπην ἔχειν, as is so neatly expressed in 1 Cor 13:1-4Thomas Dolhanty wrote:... both of the sons are cads. The apparent virtues of the elder - “πιστός” … “ἐργαστικός” … “σώφρων” … “χρηστός”… φείδωλος - turn out to be, in him, no virtues at all.cwconrad wrote: It seems to me, however, that what make it difficult to talk about these figures in Jesus' parables is that we recognize them as "types" not by the nouns and adjectives used to describe them, but rather by the verbal expressions that tell us of their behavior. I remember being taught (FWIW!) that whereas English-speakers make the most of nouns (especially abstract nouns) and adjectives to describe people, ancient Greek preferred to rely more upon verbs to do that. That may be an overgeneralization, but there's something to the notion of paying more attention to what people do than to what they say about themselves or others. Also, it seems that Jesus' parables --- especially the Lucan ones -- frequently call attention to the flaws in the virtuous and the good instincts of bad-behavors.
The dynamics of the verbs reveal the younger son coming to recognize his need for the father, and the older son to be loveless and unforgiving. But there are no adjectives in the narrative to tell you that exactly, and that I thnk is the power of the narrative. The revelation of true character is revealed through the verbs, similar to Matt 21:28ff. The unwritten adjectives which the climax of the parable leaves you with for the brothers are μετανοῶν and ἀνέλεος / μὴ ἔχων ἀγάπην
Ἐὰν ταῖς γλώσσαις τῶν ἀνθρώπων λαλῶ καὶ τῶν ἀγγέλων, ἀγάπην δὲ μὴ ἔχω, γέγονα χαλκὸς ἠχῶν ἢ κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον. καὶ ἐὰν ἔχω προφητείαν καὶ εἰδῶ τὰ μυστήρια πάντα καὶ πᾶσαν τὴν γνῶσιν καὶ ἐὰν ἔχω πᾶσαν τὴν πίστιν ὥστε ὄρη μεθιστάναι, ἀγάπην δὲ μὴ ἔχω, οὐθέν εἰμι. κἂν ψωμίσω πάντα τὰ ὑπάρχοντά μου καὶ ἐὰν παραδῶ τὸ σῶμά μου ἵνα καυχήσωμαι, ἀγάπην δὲ μὴ ἔχω, οὐδὲν ὠφελοῦμαι.
οὔτοι ἀπ’ ἀρχῆς πάντα θεοὶ θνητοῖς ὑπέδειξαν,
ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ ζητέοντες ἐφευρίσκουσιν ἄμεινον. (Xenophanes, Fragment 16)
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ ζητέοντες ἐφευρίσκουσιν ἄμεινον. (Xenophanes, Fragment 16)
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: May 20th, 2014, 10:13 am
- Location: west coast of Canada
Re: Luke 15:13 etc. ἄσωτος υἱός and ???? υἱός
Ἰδού, ἡ καρδία τοῦ πατρός·cwconrad wrote:I don't think it's quite fair to refer to both the younger and older sons as "cads"; I'd prefer to say that they are, like most of us, flawed human beings ...
γράφω μαθεῖν
-
- Posts: 3351
- Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Luke 15:13 etc. ἄσωτος υἱός and ???? υἱός
It would be nice if we had an actual collocational dictionary for ancient Greek. It could answer these kind of questions.Stephen Hughes wrote:If the son who left is escribed as the ἄσωτος υἱός. What would the son who stayed be referred to as? σώφρων "sensible"? φείδωλος "frugal" / "sparing"?Luke 15:13 wrote:Καὶ μετ’ οὐ πολλὰς ἡμέρας συναγαγὼν ἅπαντα ὁ νεώτερος υἱὸς ἀπεδήμησεν εἰς χώραν μακράν, καὶ ἐκεῖ διεσκόρπισεν τὴν οὐσίαν αὐτοῦ, ζῶν ἀσώτως.
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia
Melbourne, Australia
-
- Posts: 711
- Joined: May 5th, 2011, 9:21 pm
- Location: Burnsville, MN, USA
- Contact:
Re: Luke 15:13 etc. ἄσωτος υἱός and ???? υἱός
Carl wrote:
https://www.google.com/search?q=john+do ... =bks&tbo=1
Take a look at John Donovan's Advanced Theory of Greek Composition, (2 vols.) Oxford, 1921. It can be found on Google books. It has lots of suggestions with numerous examples which I think could help flush out the differences between Greek and English... whereas English-speakers make the most of nouns (especially abstract nouns) and adjectives to describe people, ancient Greek preferred to rely more upon verbs to do that.
https://www.google.com/search?q=john+do ... =bks&tbo=1