οὐκ ἀφανεῖς - not unseen - if there was a distinction to be made between ἀφανής and ἀόρατος, I think that only sight is involved in ὁρατός-ἀόρατος, whereas φανερός-ἀφανής/-κρυπτός could involve not only ὁρατός-ἀόρατος, but also perhaps ἁπτός-ἄναπτος and ἀκουστός-οὐκ ἀκουστός. In other words ἀφανής means not on show, which means they are ἀόρατος, ἄναπτος and οὐκ ἀκουστός, and could imply that they are οὐκ κρυπτός.Wes Wood wrote:Chapter 1, section 19 - Text and Translation
Xenophon, Oeconomicus Chapter 1 wrote:  ἀλλὰ μὰ Δί᾽, ἔφη ὁ Σωκράτης, οὐκ ἀφανεῖς εἰσιν, ἀλλὰ καὶ πάνυ φανεροί. καὶ ὅτι πονηρότατοί γέ εἰσιν οὐδὲ σὲ λανθάνουσιν, εἴπερ πονηρίαν γε νομίζεις ἀργίαν τ᾽ εἶναι καὶ μαλακίαν ψυχῆς καὶ ἀμέλειαν.Wes Wood Translation: Partly rigid and partly free wrote:“But by Jupiter they are not unseen,” Socrates was saying, “but they are evident to all, and because they are most grievous they can’t possibly escape your notice either, if indeed you consider laziness to be wickedness, whether that laziness manifests itself as the complacency that results from a life of luxury or general negligence.
οὐδὲ σὲ λανθάνουσιν - escape your notice is okay, not be observed by you is also okay. It depends how you work it with οὐκ ἀφανεῖς and φανεροί.
whether that laziness manifests itself as the complacency that results from a life of luxury or general negligence - how did a simple list become this?