Thanks for that. It is written in a really neat hand. Do you have any idea of what the "Lect." refers to in that transcription?Stirling Bartholomew wrote:Transcription of D with links to images of the manuscript:
Codex Bezae: Cambridge, University Library: Nn.2.41
http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/1663/1/Bezae%2DGreek.xml#top
Textual variant in Acts 16:10
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
:10 Re: D's paraphrase and embellishment as a way to Greek
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
-
- Posts: 3351
- Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: :10 Re: D's paraphrase and embellishment as a way to Gr
According to the transcription key:Stephen Hughes wrote:Thanks for that. It is written in a really neat hand. Do you have any idea of what the "Lect." refers to in that transcription?Stirling Bartholomew wrote:Transcription of D with links to images of the manuscript:
Codex Bezae: Cambridge, University Library: Nn.2.41
http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/1663/1/Bezae%2DGreek.xml#top
But the mouse-over doesn't seem to work in Chrome.Lect. indicates a marginal lectionary note. Mouse-over displays a box giving information about the note
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia
Melbourne, Australia
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
The meaning of Lect. in D.
Okay, thanks for that. I had assumed it was referring to something in the margins, but when I saw it next the "εν βηθλεεμ της ϊουδαιας" of line 21 of the first page there (Folio 3v Quire_1-3v (hair) ) and then checked the photo and found that that line was interlined with the others, I got confused.Stephen Carlson wrote:According to the transcription key:Lect. indicates a marginal lectionary note. Mouse-over displays a box giving information about the note
I see now that "Lect." Means that there is ANOTHER note written on the margin of the page, other than the New Testament text.
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
-
- Posts: 711
- Joined: May 5th, 2011, 9:21 pm
- Location: Burnsville, MN, USA
- Contact:
Re: Textual variant in Acts 16:10
See the site http://www.skypoint.com/members/waltzmn ... s.html#uDe for a review of the manuscript.
F.J. Foakes-Jackson & Kirsopp Lake who authored The Beginnings of Christianity: The Acts of The Apostles in volume II (2) has the text of Vaticanus (B) and Codex Bezae (D) side by side (in miniscule). Codex Bezae is particularly embellishing in the book of Acts, not so much in the gospels.
Here is the WorldCat link for this book: http://www.worldcat.org/search?q=ti%3A% ... dblist=638
F.J. Foakes-Jackson & Kirsopp Lake who authored The Beginnings of Christianity: The Acts of The Apostles in volume II (2) has the text of Vaticanus (B) and Codex Bezae (D) side by side (in miniscule). Codex Bezae is particularly embellishing in the book of Acts, not so much in the gospels.
Here is the WorldCat link for this book: http://www.worldcat.org/search?q=ti%3A% ... dblist=638