James Tauber has started generating infinitive forms for all GNT verbs, you can see this on the MorphGNT github account.
This is preliminary, and may have significant errors, it is part of the morphological lexicon he will present at SBLGNT in November. He said I could post it here as long as I mention these caveats. Feedback is welcome - feel free to enter issues on github.
James Tauber: Infinitives for GNT Verbs
-
- Posts: 4167
- Joined: May 5th, 2011, 5:34 pm
- Location: Durham, NC
- Contact:
James Tauber: Infinitives for GNT Verbs
ἐξίσταντο δὲ πάντες καὶ διηποροῦντο, ἄλλος πρὸς ἄλλον λέγοντες, τί θέλει τοῦτο εἶναι;
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Re: James Tauber: Infinitives for GNT Verbs
The most striking issue at present is that aorist infinitives don't take the augment - except if one would call something like what happens to ἄγειν (ἀγαγεῖν) an augment.
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
-
- Posts: 3351
- Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: James Tauber: Infinitives for GNT Verbs
No, that's just a reduplicated aorist (stem). The indicative will have the syllabic augment: ἤγαγον.Stephen Hughes wrote:The most striking issue at present is that aorist infinitives don't take the augment - except if one would call something like what happens to ἄγειν (ἀγαγεῖν) an augment.
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia
Melbourne, Australia
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Re: James Tauber: Infinitives for GNT Verbs
That word has an air of confidence.Stephen Carlson wrote:just
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
-
- Posts: 4167
- Joined: May 5th, 2011, 5:34 pm
- Location: Durham, NC
- Contact:
Re: James Tauber: Infinitives for GNT Verbs
He "just" did an update that fixes this problem.Stephen Hughes wrote:The most striking issue at present is that aorist infinitives don't take the augment - except if one would call something like what happens to ἄγειν (ἀγαγεῖν) an augment.
ἐξίσταντο δὲ πάντες καὶ διηποροῦντο, ἄλλος πρὸς ἄλλον λέγοντες, τί θέλει τοῦτο εἶναι;
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Re: James Tauber: Infinitives for GNT Verbs
Is there methodology behind the decision to only include the present and aorist?Jonathan Robie wrote:James Tauber has started generating infinitive forms for all GNT verbs
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
-
- Posts: 4167
- Joined: May 5th, 2011, 5:34 pm
- Location: Durham, NC
- Contact:
Re: James Tauber: Infinitives for GNT Verbs
Yes - see Randall Buth's post on this.Stephen Hughes wrote:Is there methodology behind the decision to only include the present and aorist?Jonathan Robie wrote:James Tauber has started generating infinitive forms for all GNT verbs
ἐξίσταντο δὲ πάντες καὶ διηποροῦντο, ἄλλος πρὸς ἄλλον λέγοντες, τί θέλει τοῦτο εἶναι;
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Re: James Tauber: Infinitives for GNT Verbs
Okay. It is not meant to be an comprehensive list of all infinitives, just a list for fluency training. Is that the point?Jonathan Robie wrote:Yes - see Randall Buth's post on this.Stephen Hughes wrote:Is there methodology behind the decision to only include the present and aorist?Jonathan Robie wrote:James Tauber has started generating infinitive forms for all GNT verbs
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
-
- Posts: 4167
- Joined: May 5th, 2011, 5:34 pm
- Location: Durham, NC
- Contact:
Re: James Tauber: Infinitives for GNT Verbs
Yes, he produced this list at my request. But he is also doing a much more complete morphological lexicon, of which this is just a small part.Stephen Hughes wrote:Okay. It is not meant to be an comprehensive list of all infinitives, just a list for fluency training. Is that the point?Jonathan Robie wrote:Yes - see Randall Buth's post on this.
ἐξίσταντο δὲ πάντες καὶ διηποροῦντο, ἄλλος πρὸς ἄλλον λέγοντες, τί θέλει τοῦτο εἶναι;
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/