Sentence Adverbs

dalmatia at eburg.com dalmatia at eburg.com
Sat Aug 15 11:03:52 EDT 1998


clayton stirling bartholomew wrote:

> I wonder however,
> if the kind of EVIDENCE that can be mustered to defend the idea of a "sentence
> adverb" will be substantial enough to convince someone who is skeptical. I
> would like to see how this would be done.

Actually, so would I.  :-)

> Any adverbial that can be seen as limiting the whole clause, can
> most likely also be seen as limiting the main verb or in the absence of the a
> main verb it can probably be seen as limiting some other element in the
> clause. 

The more I thought about this, the more daunting it became.  Forget
the Greek, for a moment ~ Can it be proven in English?  If I say to
you: "Incidentally, your brother did stop by the post office this
morning," the entire sentence following 'Incidentally' would seem to
be modified/limited by it. Can it be proven?  How? 

As well, the sentence:  "Theoretically you are correct but practically
you cannot succeed," carries two of them.  Place them in a little
different order and they shift gears.  ["You are correct
theoretically... etc.]  And Greek word order does not work according
to the same rules as English.  So word order in English might/could be
determinative, whereas in Greek it would fail... arguably...

> I just cannot picture how someone could come up with argument proving
> the existence of a sentence adverb in a NT Greek clause which would pass the
> test of being falsifiable.

Actually, the test of falsifiability, so crucial to engineering, may
be a tad misplaced when applied to our efforts to try to understand
what another human being or culture means with their usage of words. 
We like to link A to B, then B to C, then C to D, but we hesitate to
apply X to the linkage of A, B, C and D, which is what the sentence
adverb idea would like us to do. X[A:B::B:C::C:D]  We would rather
modify one of the terms, say B, rather than the whole [enclosed in
brackets] as a modifiable unit of discourse.  And a writer perhaps
COULD mean it either way...
 
> Willing to be proven wrong, but I need to see an example in NT Greek which
> must be a sentence adverb and cannot be a regular adverb.

I'm not sure if I've proven anything, but I've sure got my nose and
paws in the pile ~  

Thanks Clay!!

George

******************************************
Lisa Messmer..................ICQ# 5666415
George Blaisdell        dalmatia at eburg.com

Have you seen Dulcie?  Look for her Heart!
http://www.eburg.com/~dalmatia/dulcie.html

Last Chance for Animals...Fight Pet Theft!
http://www.lcanimal.org



More information about the B-Greek mailing list