The word alone in Romans 3:28
Christopher Hutson
crhutson at salisbury.net
Mon Aug 24 20:20:42 EDT 1998
Thanks, Jim,
for the correction. I don't know why I wasn't seeing it before. I
followed Luther right up the garden path.
XPIC
------------------------------------
Christopher R. Hutson
Hood Theological Seminary
Salisbury, NC 28144
crhutson at salisbury.net
------------------------------------
Jim West wrote:
>>On Mon 24 Aug 98 (02:17:08), mathew3830 at aol.com wrote:
>>>I would like to know
>>> if there is any justification for including the word alone in
Romans
>>> 3:28. If there is, what would that justification be? Is it based
>>> primarily on interpretation?
>
>
>No- there is no textual justification for including "allein"- Luther
here
>(and in several places) simply allowed his theology to influence his
>translation.
>
>Thus, yes, "alone" is an interpretative move.
>
>
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list