Relationship of grammar to exegesis

Jonathan Robie jonathan at texcel.no
Fri Jul 24 21:00:40 EDT 1998


At 08:26 AM 7/24/98 -0400, Carl W. Conrad wrote:
 
>"Few, if any, B-Greekers make the simplistic assumption that  determining
>the precise meanings of words in context, parsing the verbs, nouns, and
>adjectives and construing the syntax of a Biblical Greek verse, is
>sufficient to unlock all the meaning in that verse. But most, if not all
>B-Greekers, do assume, I think, that one must do this spade-work with a
>text before serious exploration of the broad range of questions involved in
>exegesis of the text in question. What we postulate is not that exegesis is
>nothing but grammar, but that grammatical analysis is a SINE QUA NON in the
>exegetical process."
 
I would say that even understanding the way the language is used in a
passage goes way beyond "determining the precise meanings of words in
context, parsing the verbs, nouns, and adjectives and construing the syntax
of a Biblical Greek verse". But of course, it does start there.

Jonathan



More information about the B-Greek mailing list