Pauline Authorship of Hebrews
Mark Goodacre
M.S.GOODACRE at bham.ac.uk
Fri Oct 2 08:44:01 EDT 1998
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu wrote:
> ...there appears to be no basis at all in the NT
> Greek text for the proposition being argued here--and although it is
> proposed that "the almost universal testimony of the MS evidence is
> that Hebrews is Pauline," I do wonder exactly what MS evidence is being
> referred to here...
P46 is probably worth mentioning. It is a papyrus codex of 86 leaves dating
from c. 200 and featuring epistles in this order: Romans, Hebrews, 1 Cor., 2
Cor., Eph., Gal., Phil., Col and 1 Thess. I think that this is as early as the
the paypyrus evidence will take us.
Mark
--------------------------------------
Dr Mark Goodacre mailto:M.S.Goodacre at bham.ac.uk
Dept of Theology Tel: +44 (0)121 414 7512
University of Birmingham Fax: +44 (0)121 414 6866
Birmingham B15 2TT
United Kingdom
Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/goodacre
World Without Q: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/q
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list