James 2:15 (loosely connected to "Compound subjects with hH" [sic])

Carl W. Conrad cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu
Mon Sep 7 07:51:30 EDT 1998


At 6:49 PM -0500 9/06/98, Paul Zellmer wrote:
>I didn't realize when I asked my question about the *H* in James 2:15
>this past weekend that this has been an area of debate in the past.
>However, I finally found the time to research it in Robertson's big
>yellow tome (did I get your term right, Jonathan?) and definitely got
>the impression that this is an isolated case of *H* serving as a
>conjunction that _combines_ two items, which would result in a plural
>subject.  The other possibility he points out is Gal 1:8, but it does
>not appear as clearly there.  Since ATR's book was written, have other
>extra-biblical examples been found?
>
>In thinking about the James verse, however, another question came to me:
>Why is James _specifying_ the woman here?  Is not the normal greek form
>to treat the masculine form as possibly including the feminine, while
>the feminine form is locked into its gender?  If that's the case,
>ADELFOS already gives the possibility for both, and H ADELFH is not
>really required.  Two questions then arise: Are there other cases that
>you all can recall where both the masculine and feminine are specified,
>and what is the significance of such specification?

Paul:

I did a quick search with Accordance and found several instances where both
ADELFOS and ADELFH are used. In addition to Jas 2:15 EAN ADELFOS H ADELFH
GUMNOI hUPARCWSIN KAI LEIPOMENOI THS EFHMEROU TROFHS ... the most
significant are:

Mt 12:50 (= Mk 3:35) hOSTIS GAR AN POIHSHi TO QELHMA TOU PATROS MOU TOU EN
OURANOIS AUTOS MOU ADELFOS KAI ADELFH KAI MHTHR ESTIN.
at 19:29 (= Mk 10:29-30) KAI PAS hOSTIS AFHKEN OIKIAS H ADELFOUS H ADEFAS H
PATERA H MHTERA H TEKNA H AGROUS hENEKEN TOU ONOMATOS MOU, hEKATONPLASIONA
LHMYETAI KAI ZWHN AIWNION KLHRONOMHSEI.
Lk 14:26 EI TIS ERCETAI PROS ME KAI OU MISEI TON PATERA hEAUTOU KAI THN
MHTERA KAI THN GUNAIKA KAI TA TEKNA KAI TOUS ADELFOUS KAI TAS ADELFAS, ETI
TE KAI THN YUCHN hEAUTOU, OU DUNATAI EINAI MOU MAQHTHS.
1Cor 7:15 EI DE hO APISTOS CWRIZETAI, CWRIZESQW: OU DEDOULWTAI hO ADELFOS H
hH ADELFH EN TOIS TOIOUTOIS; EN DE EIRHNHi KEKLHKEN hUMAS hO QEOS.

In my judgment, the explanation for these is simple: even if ADELFOS is the
generic word and may technically imply ADELFH as well, I think that ADELFH
is specifically added in each of the above verses to exclude any
possibility that ADELFOS may be thought to indicate ONLY the male sibling.
This is surely the case with the passages from the Synoptic gospels, where
the listing of members of a nuclear family is clearly intended to be
inclusive. But I think it is quite clearly the intention in 1 Cor 7:15 and
Jas 2:15 as well,in both of which ADELFOS/ADELFH has reference to a member
of the body of Christ.

And as for your original question about the plural predicate adjective and
verb used with ADELFOS H ADELFH, I'm not sure what else you may have found
in your ATR research, but it strikes me that the )\H in this instance may
be used to indicate potentially inclusive alternatives, like Latin VEL (as
opposed to Latin AUT which disjoins exclusive alternatives)--i.e. )\H in
this instance especially must be understood not to mean "or else" but
"and/or"--and the "and" possibility is sufficient occasion for the plural
predicate adjective GUMNOI and plural verb hUPARACWSIN.



Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics/Washington University
One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
Home: 7222 Colgate Ave./St. Louis, MO 63130/(314) 726-5649
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu OR cconrad at yancey.main.nc.us
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 3600 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/b-greek/attachments/19980907/60891c4a/attachment.bin 


More information about the B-Greek mailing list