Philippians 2:6

Carl W. Conrad cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu
Mon Dec 20 20:14:01 EST 1999


At 6:39 PM -0600 12/20/99, Grant Polle wrote:
>     While reading the chapter of Philippians 2, I noticed that verse 6
>varies significantly from translation to translation.
>
>KJV for example reads: "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not
>robbery to be equal with God."
>WE: "He was in every way like God. Yet he did not think that being equal
>to God was something he must hold on to. "
>YLT "who, being in the form of God, thought [it] not robbery to be equal
>to God, "
>
>NIV reads, "Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with
>God something to be grasped,"
>Darby "who, subsisting in the form of God, did not esteem it an object of
>rapine to be on an equality with God; "
>NASB "who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality
>with God a thing to be grasped
>
>"hOS EN MORFH QEOU hYPARCHON OUCH hARPAGMON hHGHSATO TO EINAI  ISA QEO."
>
>It seems that two interpretations result.
>
> On one hand, Jesus does not attempt equality." This seems to agree with
>opponents of the Trinity.
> Yet, on the other hand, KJV's translation and others shows Jesus as not
>considering his equality as robbery or that his equality was wrong.
>
> Which of the two translations agrees more with what the bible writer
>intended?

We really need to be careful in attempting to respond to this question; the
text is one that has played a very significant role again and again in the
history of Christian theology, and it is difficult, perhaps even
impossible, to go at this text as if one had never seen it before and as if
one were not aware of at least one significant way in which the passage has
been interpreted. There have been many threads on this text on B-Greek in
the past, one significant one on MORFH and hARPAAGMOS in October of 1998,
one a couple years earlier that I myself initiated and that went on for
quite some time. I take the liberty of citing from our own archives from
this past June a message from Mark Goodacre that is very relevant to your
question:

>From: "Mark Goodacre" <M.S.GOODACRE at bham.ac.uk>
>Organization: The University of Birmingham
>To: Biblical Greek <b-greek at franklin.oit.unc.edu>
>Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 12:28:43 GMT
>Subject: Re: Phil. 2:6-An Example of Anaphora?
>
>I would like to recommend a recent book on this topic:
>
>Ralph P. Martin & Brian J. Dodd (eds.), _Where Christology Began: Essays on
>Philippians 2_ (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1998)
>
>Every single essay (bar one) in the volume deal with Phil. 2.6-11.  My
>head was
>spinning by the end of it -- this is definitely not a book to be read in one
>sitting.  It is valuable, though.  It features a defence by Jimmy Dunn of his
>Adamic, non-pre-existence reading of this piece (cf. Carl's comments).  It
>also
>features much criticism of Dunn's reading, most explicitly by Richard Bauckham
>in "The Worship of Jesus in Philippians 2.9-11", the best essay in the book.
>He thinks that the hymn exhibits an "eschatological monotheism" that "took
>christological form in the earliest Christian reflection on the exaltation of
>Jesus" (p. 136).
>
>There is lots of discussion in the various essays re. the meaning of hARPAGMOS
>and the specific clause mentioned.  Indeed Gerald Hawthorne has an essay
>in the
>book in which he defends the reading mentioned by Edgar Foster.
>
>The book will be a most useful one for anyone researching Phil. 2.6-11 --
>strongly recommended.

Very briefly, one needs to be aware that there are at least two, but in
fact, several variations on each of the two, interpretations of the passage
in question. I would hope that whatever new discussion of this text ensues
now will remain focus pretty sharply upon the Greek text and what it may
legitimately be understood to mean in terms of its morphology, syntax, and
diction.



Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics/Washington University
One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
Home: 7222 Colgate Ave./St. Louis, MO 63130/(314) 726-5649
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 4122 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/b-greek/attachments/19991220/47f59c82/attachment.bin 


More information about the B-Greek mailing list