Gal 5:17 - Comments aside

RHutchin at aol.com RHutchin at aol.com
Fri Dec 31 12:24:12 EST 1999


I recently saw an article proposing that one read Gal 5:17 as--

hH GAR SARX EPIQUMEI KATA TOU PNEUMATOS.... 
(TO DE PNEUMA KATA THS SARKOS TAUTA GAR ALLHLOIS ANTIKEITAI) 
...hINA MH hA EAN QELHTE TAUTA POIHTE.

and then presenting a defense for the position.

Regardless of the validity of the above position, but using it as an example, 
how does the writer of Greek insert asides into an argument without having 
the presence of those asides debated 2,000 years later to the detriment of 
the argument?

Roger Hutchinson
RHutchin at AOL.com



More information about the B-Greek mailing list