Pros

Donald L. Shaffer dshaf45917 at aol.com
Fri Jun 4 05:37:13 EDT 1999


On 06/03/99, "George Blaisdell <maqhth at hotmail.com>" wrote:
> Now EIMI plus PROS plus accusative would seem to fit this formulation with
> great precision, indeed in such a way as to define it as virtually 
> relationship itself [to Platonize Aristotle a tad!].  So when John 1:1 has
> hO LOGOS HN PROS TON QEON, we can assume on this approach that it clearly
> means relationship, where hO LOGOS is TO in the formulation, and TON QEON is
> TI, and the HN is the very implied stative verb of existence in TO PROS TI.

I'm sure that some day I will understand this better.  It would help to 
know what TO and TI mean.  But thanks, I will save this for later 
reference.

Donald L. Shaffer



More information about the B-Greek mailing list