SULLAMBANW active w/dative?
clayton stirling bartholomew
c.s.bartholomew at worldnet.att.net
Mon Jun 7 13:04:17 EDT 1999
Is SULLAMBANW active (not middle) ever found with a substantive in the
dative case where it means seize or arrest?
I am trying to make sense out of one of the "obvious errors" in Codex
Bezae, Acts 17:18 which replaces SUNEBALLON with SUNELABON. I know that
making sense out of "obvious errors" is a dubious exercise but then
reading Codex Bezae is a dubious exercise as well.
There is another "obvious error" which is hard to read in this verse,
the replacement of hOI DE with OIDEN. I didn't find anyway to make sense
out of that one, but the SUNELABON reading seemed to hover on the
boundary of intelligibility with the exception of the dative pronoun
AUTWi.
--
Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list