Mt 19:9

Ben Crick ben.crick at argonet.co.uk
Wed May 12 23:00:59 EDT 1999


On Wed 12 May 99 (13:54:50), dd-1 at juno.com wrote:
> Please note the following:
> 
> "hOS AN APOLUSHi THN GUNAIKA AUTOU MH EPI PORNEIA
> KAI GAMHSHi ALLHN MOICATAI"

 Dear Danny:

 Yes, I am familiar with Wenham's take on this issue. To me, it seems
 that we have a "logical conjunction" here; two propositions conjoined
 with the Boolean operator AND. So we have {[P] AND [Q]} = R :

 {[hOS AN APOLUSHi THN GUNAIKA AUTOU MH EPI PORNEIA]
       KAI
  [GAMHSHi ALLHN]}
     MOICATAI

 So on these grounds I would disagree with Wenham. IF someone divorces
 another BECAUSE OF adultery, and marries another: THEN s/he does NOT
 commit adultery.

 IF (P AND Q) THEN R;  IF NOT-P AND Q THEN NOT-R.  IYSWIM.

 ERRWSQE
 Ben
-- 
 Revd Ben Crick, BA CF
 <ben.crick at argonet.co.uk>
 232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK)
 http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm






More information about the B-Greek mailing list