Mt 19:9
Ben Crick
ben.crick at argonet.co.uk
Wed May 12 23:00:59 EDT 1999
On Wed 12 May 99 (13:54:50), dd-1 at juno.com wrote:
> Please note the following:
>
> "hOS AN APOLUSHi THN GUNAIKA AUTOU MH EPI PORNEIA
> KAI GAMHSHi ALLHN MOICATAI"
Dear Danny:
Yes, I am familiar with Wenham's take on this issue. To me, it seems
that we have a "logical conjunction" here; two propositions conjoined
with the Boolean operator AND. So we have {[P] AND [Q]} = R :
{[hOS AN APOLUSHi THN GUNAIKA AUTOU MH EPI PORNEIA]
KAI
[GAMHSHi ALLHN]}
MOICATAI
So on these grounds I would disagree with Wenham. IF someone divorces
another BECAUSE OF adultery, and marries another: THEN s/he does NOT
commit adultery.
IF (P AND Q) THEN R; IF NOT-P AND Q THEN NOT-R. IYSWIM.
ERRWSQE
Ben
--
Revd Ben Crick, BA CF
<ben.crick at argonet.co.uk>
232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK)
http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list