Luke's Semitic Style
Mark Goodacre
M.S.GOODACRE at bham.ac.uk
Mon May 17 11:19:03 EDT 1999
On 17 May 99 at 10:06, Jim West wrote:
> The rest of Luke seems a bit more semitic than Mark- but certainly not more so
> than Matthew. Why? I think Luke is dependent on sources here- and close
> attention being paid one will notice that the most semitic elements occur
> where Lk has not made use of Mark. I take this as an indication that Q was a
> semitic source. And that Luke's special material (called by us old guys "L")
> was also semitic in origin.
Subject, of course, to correction from Carl and Edward, this sounds to me more
like a Synoptic-L topic than a b-greek one. If Jim or anyone wants to raise it
there, I would (for one) be interested in discussing it.
With good wishes
Mark
--------------------------------------
Dr Mark Goodacre mailto:M.S.Goodacre at bham.ac.uk
Dept of Theology tel: +44 121 414 7512
University of Birmingham fax: +44 121 414 6866
Birmingham B15 2TT United Kingdom
http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/goodacre
Aseneth Home Page
Recommended New Testament Web Resources
Mark Without Q
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list