Matt 19:9 & the Present Tense

dixonps at juno.com dixonps at juno.com
Mon Oct 11 11:28:41 EDT 1999




On Mon, 11 Oct 1999 08:59:45 -0500 Steven Craig Miller
<scmiller at www.plantnet.com> writes:
>
> The English translation "commits adultery" might give some the 
> impression that the sin is committed only during the marriage 
> ceremony. I  wonder if  the present tense might be better translated
> as: "living in  adultery"? 

> PD: << The problem is that the present tense may denote a 
> progressive nuance, that is, "is committing adultery (in the act of 
> remarriage)". This, of course, addresses the issue made by some
> over whether remarriage constitutes an on-going act of adultery. 
> This cannot be proved by the use of the present tense. The nuance
> may be merely progressive. >>
> 
> I find it interesting that at Matthew 19:9 we have three verbs, two 
> are  aorist and one is present tense.
> 
> "And I say to you, whoever divorces [aorist] his woman, except for
> infidelity [or: prostitution [?]), and marries [aorist] another 
> lives in adultery [present]." 
> 
> If the Matthean Jesus wanted to suggest that the act of adultery was 
> a punctiliar act as opposed to a linear act, why didn't he keep to the 
> aorist  tense, why the switch to the present tense? The statement
> seems very clear  to me. The Greek verb translated as "divorces" is 
> in the aorist  tense because it is viewed as a punctiliar act. The
Greek 
> verb translated as "marries" is in the aorist tense because it is
viewed
> as a  punctiliar act.

> But the verb translated as "lives in adultery" (or "commits 
> adultery") is in the present tense because it is viewed as a linear
act. Why else 
> the switch to the present tense?

Again, the present tense may denote what you are arguing for here, 
but it does not have to.  It may denote a progressive nuance (is 
committing adultery in the act of remarriage).

Or, it may be a gnomic present, often referred to as the aorist present,
something that is timeless in reality, true of all time (compare the
use of SPEIRETAI in 1 Cor 15:42ff).

The point is you simply can not prove your thesis by an appeal to
the use of the present tense here.

Paul Dixon

.





More information about the B-Greek mailing list