1Cor 2:6
Dmitriy Reznik
reznik1 at juno.com
Thu Apr 6 20:45:26 EDT 2000
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000 18:59:16 -0500 "Carl W. Conrad"
<cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu> writes:
>
> I will put in my usual assertion here: unless a middle/passive form
> can be
> shown to be passive by some clear indication of passive sense (such
> as a
> hUPO + genitive or instrumental dative indicator of external
> efficient
> cause), it ought normally to be understood as a middle voice form.
>
*******
Can't using this word KATARGHSHi in 1Cor 1:28 be such an indication? KAI
TA AGENH TO KOSMOU KAI TA EXOUQENHMENA EXELHXATO hO QEOS, TA MH ONTA,
hINA TA ONTA KATARGHSHi. Doesn't subject's presince indicate this word to
be passive in 1Cor 2:6?
By the way, have you ever met anywhere TA ONTA or TA MH ONTA having
meaning like this?
Thank you.
Dmitriy
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list