Rom 1:1 KLHTOS APOSTOLOS

Charles Skallerud karolus at wf.net
Sat Apr 8 10:30:31 EDT 2000


As a footnote, 'sent-one' is fine, but people have a hard time accepting
this as a translation.  I've tried to find a way around 'apostle' for years.
So far nothing works.  Did you intend this as a technical footnote or a
translation?  I missed the beginning of this thread so excuse me if I'm on
the wrong track.

Charles Skallerud


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mr. Gary S. Dykes" <yhwh3in1 at lightspeed.net>
To: "Biblical Greek" <b-greek at franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2000 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: Rom 1:1 KLHTOS APOSTOLOS


> Dear Mr. Miller (and Crick):
>
> In my work on Romans and I Cor. I treated both opening verses as saying
> this:
>
> "Paul, called, sent-one"  OR
>
> "Paul, (a) called-one, (a) sent-one..."
>
> Viewing the adjectives as nominatives in simple opposition. Hence, Crick's
> Rom. 1:7 does not fit the scheme.
>
> True, Paul is an apostle, but too often he is confused with the 12. His
> calling is distinct, and he really hammers this home in both of these
> epistles.
>
> The above is simply my opinion.
>
> Mr. Gary S. Dykes
> Swanson's Errata List -- http://userzweb.lightspeed.net/yhwh3in1/
> Contributions welcomed
>
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
> You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: karolus at wf.net
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
$subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek at franklin.oit.unc.edu
>
>
>




More information about the B-Greek mailing list