Roots according to R. Buth

clayton stirling bartholomew c.s.bartholomew at worldnet.att.net
Fri Dec 29 15:10:37 EST 2000



Randall Buth wrote on b-hebrew list:

> Roots are second order derivatives, abstractions. They are not ("were not")
> part of the real, funtctional semantic framework of the language but are
> ("were") only an undeveloped potential of the language, and/or a
> non-communicative historicization (=etymology).

Here we have a fine sample of R. Buth "roasting his own." I thought it was
worth posting here for the benefit of those who don't follow b-hebrew.

To get the context you will need to look in the b-hebrew archives:

http://franklin.oit.unc.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?visit=b-hebrew&id=136603120


--  
Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062





More information about the B-Greek mailing list