LXX and MT, relevancey

Fish__44 at excite.com Fish__44 at excite.com
Wed Feb 2 23:28:08 EST 2000


 



>  
>  I'm struggling (as I'm sure other List members are also doing) to discern
how this is
>  in any way a B-Greek question. How considerations of grammar and syntax
of any
>  Biblical Greek text has any bearing on why the LXX chronology differs
from that of
>  the MT or whether either (or neither) is right is beyond me.
>  
>  So before Carl steps in on this and (perhaps) chides you for posing yet
again an off
>  topic question, might I suggest that you pose this, and similar
questions, on more
>  appropriate Lists? There is, for instance,  a Septuagint List for which
your question
>  would be suitable.
>  
>  And it probably wouldn't hurt for you to have a long hard look at the FAQ
and the
>  home page of B-Greek to reacquaint yourself with what the scope of this
List is.
>  
I rarely offer my two-cents to this list for this exact reason. I myself
originally became intersted in Greek thanks inpart to the LXX and what it
had to offer historically to both the OT and the NT. I have posted a few
questions sheepishly early on in my b-greek career, hoping that the big
B-greekers could help guide me in my littel b-greek ways, but was cordially
shunned and left to become a silent partner to musings of Conrad, Gibson and
few other regulars. Although I appreciate the forum and the interesting
dialogue I detest the snobery which seems to come out in the most simple
answer. If not as a teacher enjoying the process of teaching, perhaps as a
Christian you can enjoy the process of helping a fledgling along. I suggest
an off-list apology be issued to Grant, and a sense of gratitude be paid to
the Lord for giving you both the knowledge and the ability to share it with
others.

Thanks for your time,

Cameron VanEpps





_______________________________________________________
Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite
Visit http://freeworld.excite.com




More information about the B-Greek mailing list