Gen 3:16 LXX & Susan T. Foh
Roe
d.roe at t-online.de
Wed Jun 7 14:14:23 EDT 2000
clayton stirling bartholomew schrieb:
> I am not sure it would. The more I think about this the more I am inclined
> to concluded that the LXX reading here cannot be harmonized with Foh's
> interpretation.
But maybe with the "diversion, amusement" definition, it could
satisfactorily be harmonized with Wevers... (?)
BTW, (thanks to Maurice's tip on the DOULOS review), I found a review on
a book that might help (The Text of Genesis 1-11: Textual Studies and
Critical Edition):
http://www.bookreviews.org/Reviews/0195119614.html
David
D. W. Roe
Rheiland-Pfalz, Germany
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list