1 Cor 15:2 (was 2 kinds of faith)

CEP7 at aol.com CEP7 at aol.com
Sat Mar 4 15:09:26 EST 2000



In a message dated 3/4/2000 1:28:04 PM, goolde at mtnempire.net writes:

<< The common English translation of verse two reads "If you hold fast that 
word which I preached to you."  I submit that the force of the first class 
condition of
EI KATEKETE is virtually lost by this translation.  By use of the first 
class condition the authors assume, for the purpose of this argument, that 
the condition is true.  "Since you hold fast" would be an appropriate 
translation that would more accurately reflect the force of the first class 
condition.

This error is commonly repeated in the clause which follows:  EKTOS EI MH 
EIKH.  What we have here grammatically is a negative first class condition 
(EI MH) in a pleonastic (redundant) construction (EKTOS),  The redundancy 
is referenced by A.T. Robertson on page 640 of his grammar with appropriate 
cross references to 1 Cor 14:5 and 1 Tim 5:19, where similar constructions 
occur.
I would therefore suggest "since you did not believe in vain" as a 
translation.

This brings us to the lexical aspect of exegesis of this verse.  Based on 
my biblical and theological pre-suppositions it is both intentional and 
remarkable to notice that the word used here for vain is EIKH, whereas the 
authors switch to KENH in verse 14 of the same chapter.  I understand the 
meaning of EIKH to be "without a purpose" and the meaning of KENH to be 
"without a result."

I would understand the purpose here to be strongly implicit (almost 
explicit), that being for the purpose of being saved (verse 2).  The 
textual implication then, is that these Corinthians were saved by believing 
in the death and resurrection of Christ for their sins (verses 3 and 4) 
with the purpose of being saved by such belief (verse 2) and with the 
result that they stood (ESTHKATE) in this belief (verse 2).  I would 
therefore suggest the translation "since you did not believe without a 
purpose."

It seems to me that many from my theological persuasion have attempted to 
describe  EKTOS EI MH EIKH rather clumsily and inaccurately by saying 
something like "you need to believe in your heart, not just in your head," 
and to this end a very well known tract has been published by the title of 
"Missing Heaven by 18 Inches" which alludes to the distance between the 
human head and the human heart.  This misses the force of the text of 1 Cor 
15:2 and produces a rather silly analogy which is  certainly not found in 
this text, and, I suspect, nowhere else in Scripture.  All of this is to 
say that a more exact translation of I Cor 15:2 could obviate such error.

I leave further discussion of faith, whether salvation-producing or not 
salvation-producing to the theology list alone (in which I also participate).
 >>

I only have one comment to make in relation to this. I think it is 
rhetorically unwise to translate ANY 1st class condition as "since" because 
it refers for the assumption of truth for the sake of argument, and not 
simply the assumption truth. Therefore, since it is for the sake of argument, 
the translation of "if" should be retained, because "since" distances the 
reader from the argument, while "if" draws him into it.

Charles Powell
DTS
cep7 at aol.com

 



More information about the B-Greek mailing list