ane What is the lexically proven Aramaic word for Peter
Polycarp66 at aol.com
Polycarp66 at aol.com
Thu Mar 23 18:12:12 EST 2000
In a message dated 3/23/2000 1:54:00 PM Central Daylight Time,
alpersso at pe.net writes:
<<
Peter had the name "petros" before joining Christ, Mt 4:18, therefore it is
NOT just another translation of Cephas. If it were then surely in Jn 1:42 it
would be written "you shall be called petros which by interpretation is a
lithos."
>>
Did he really? Can we believe that the gospels are historically accurate in
that regard when we don't consider them to be historically accurate in other
respects?
gfsomsel
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list