koin/ classical-difference,baby
yochanan bitan
ButhFam at compuserve.com
Wed May 3 07:06:23 EDT 2000
christopher egrapsen:
>what is the difference between studying koin greek versus the
>classical greek?
Same language, slightly different dialects (Attic has dual endings and a
fuller use of the optative, to give the main structural differences.
phonology was quite different, too. Already by Roman Koine length and many
vowels had collapsed: ei=i, ai=e, w=o, oi=u.)
>A siminary I know calls koin greek baby greek.
This confuses the typical level of student attainment
(which may apply equally to 1 yr 'classical' as well as 1 yr 'koine')
with the language itself.
Koine-Hellenistic Greek was a/the world-class language,
and used for literature from the time of Alexander into the Byzantine
period.
It's vocabulary was 'awesome' (OUK ASH'MOU QHSAUROU' GLWSSW'N "not a an
insignificant treasure of vocab" as one might turn a phrase).
Naturally there were different 'registers' or levels of use, and many Koine
writers used what could be called a full Atticizing style.
Epictetus (Stoic philospher, 1CE), Paul, Luke, Appian (Roman historian
1-2CE) and Plutarch (Roman-Greek biographer 1CE), CARITON (the prototypical
romance novel, 1-2CE) all exemplify a literary Koine,
KAI OU'TOI PAN'TES KATH'RGHSAN TA TOU NHPI'OU. (cf. 1Cor 13.11 =none wrote
an "o-see, see-spot-run" greek)
If only students could read these the way that students are expected to
read Flaubert and Hugo !
EI DU'NAINTO MAQHTAI' TA TOU EPIKTH'TOU (KTL.) ANAGINW'SKEIN, KALW'S AN
E'COI.
"if students would be able to read these things of Epictetus (etc), it
would be good."
errwso
Randall Buth
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list