Rom 12 19
Wayne Leman
wleman at mcn.net
Sat May 6 17:02:50 EDT 2000
Carl reparteed:
>allegorically. And the next step is hO LOGOS; we can add TOU QEOU if we
>feel so inclined, but we don't really feel any necessity to make that
>clarification.
>
>Perilous waters, these. Parmenides once said we can only carry on
>intelligent conversation about hO TI ESTIN, that there's no talking at all
>about hO TI OUK ESTIN.
True, my empiricist friend, but if you want to be one of the blessed:
MAKARIOI HOI MH IDONTES KAI PISTEUSANTES (John 20.29)
and PISTIS, well, you know that it's:
PRAGMATWN ELEGXOS OU BLEPOMENWN (Heb. 11.1)
<G>
Wayne,
who also finds it very hard to believe in what he hasn't seen
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list