2 Peter 3:9

Chris Core jesuslover at neteze.com
Fri May 19 17:16:05 EDT 2000



Is there any reason to think that because UMA is second person, that
TINAS must be of the
same audience. As I see it the TINAS and PANTAS are of the same audience
and separate from
UMA, is there a rule for me to follow with this or must I rely solely on
the context? Could
someone shed some light on this for me.
in Christ -chris core


2 Peter 3:9 is as follows:

 9 OUBRADUNEI KURIOS THS EPAGGELIAS WS TINES BRADUTHTA HGOUNTAI ALLA
MAKROQUMEI
EIS UMA MH BOULOMENOS TINAS APOLESQAI ALLA PANTAS EIS METANOIAN XWRHSAI


The parsings I have are as follows:

UMA
Noun
Pronoun
Accusaative
Second
Plural

TINAS
Adjective
Pronominal
Indefinite
Accusative
Masculine
Plural

PANTAS
Adjective
Pronominal
Accusative
Masculine
Plural




More information about the B-Greek mailing list