1st John recipients

Mark Wilson emory2oo2 at hotmail.com
Thu Oct 12 13:49:18 EDT 2000





Francisco Orozco

You wrote:

>On the second question, there is no omission of women. It seems that the
>general terms included both male and female so that PATERES includes >male 
>and female likewise for NEANISKOI.
------

The structure you suggested (I removed it from this response) was to my 
liking. But the question that immediately came to my mind was seemingly  
anticipated in your statement above. Which leads me to this:

Are you aware of PATERES clearly referring to both male and female in any 
other Greek writing?

I would pose the same question as to the masculine NEANISKOI. Can you cite 
references where it refers to male AND FEMALE? I am looking for "undisputed" 
references at this time.

And thank you for your initial thought provoking response!!

Thank you,

Mark Wilson

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.




More information about the B-Greek mailing list