Wallace on Ga 4:14
clayton stirling bartholomew
c.s.bartholomew at worldnet.att.net
Mon Sep 18 02:30:47 EDT 2000
on 09/17/00 2:33 PM, Dan Parker wrote:
>
> On page 252 Daniel Wallace in his Exegetical Syntax says he considers
> AGGELOS QEOU to be definite along with all usages of ANNGELOS KURIOU
> in both the OT and the NT.
Dan,
You sure Wallace said that? Have you overlooked a nuance?
>
> The second hWS in the verse is generally taken as adverbial. If the
> AGGELOS QEOU is definite . . .
I don't think it is definite in this context. Also take a look at Acts 10:3
AGGELOV TOU QEOU and Dan 3:25 (LXX) AGGELOU QEOU. Keep in mind who is
speaking in Dan 3:25.
Clay
--
Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list