Wallace on Ga 4:14

clayton stirling bartholomew c.s.bartholomew at worldnet.att.net
Mon Sep 18 02:30:47 EDT 2000


on 09/17/00 2:33 PM, Dan Parker wrote:

> 
> On page 252 Daniel Wallace in his Exegetical Syntax says he considers
> AGGELOS QEOU to be definite along with all usages of ANNGELOS KURIOU
> in both the OT and the NT.

Dan,

You sure Wallace said that? Have you overlooked a nuance?

> 
> The second hWS in the verse is generally taken as adverbial.  If the
> AGGELOS QEOU is definite . . .

I don't think it is definite in this context. Also take a look at Acts 10:3
AGGELOV TOU QEOU and  Dan 3:25 (LXX) AGGELOU QEOU. Keep in mind who is
speaking in Dan 3:25.

Clay

--  
Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062





More information about the B-Greek mailing list