Wallace on dative of agency
Jon D. Boyd
johanan at juno.com
Sat Sep 23 05:04:01 EDT 2000
I was reading GGBB by Wallace in regards to Gal. 5:16. The verse in
Greek reads:
PNEUMATI PERIPATEITE KAI EPIQUMIAN SARKOS OU MH TELESHTE
He argues against taking PNEUMATI as dat. of agency for two reasons:
"(1) This usage is quite rare in the NT (unless, of course, we assume
that PNEUMATI on many occasions belongs here!); (2) PNEUMATI does not
occur with a passive verb, let along a perfect passive; yet every clear
example of dat. of agency in the NT occurs with a perfect passive verb"
(GGBB, 165-6).
What do you make of this discussion? I made a cursory check of PNEUMATI
in the NT and found it with several passive verbs (e.g. Rom. 8:14; Gal.
5:18; Eph. 1:13), which seems to disagree with Wallace's statement.
Thanks,
Jonathan Boyd
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list