EF' hWi in Rom 5.12
Carl W. Conrad
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu
Mon Dec 3 07:40:22 EST 2001
At 9:20 PM -0600 12/2/01, Steven Lo Vullo wrote:
>Greetings all:
>
>I'd like some input on EF' hWi in Rom 5.12. What is the antecedent of
>hWi? It is tagged as neuter in Accordance, but can be masculine. If
>neuter, it cannot have a single substantive as its antecedent. Any ideas?
>=============
Steven, I think that here the hWi doesn't have an antecedent in what
precedes but is rather a fairly common elliptical expression with
antecedent pressed into the relative (or relative attracted into the case
of the implicit antecedent demonstrative): EF' hWi = EPI TOUTWi hWI =
"because of this: that" or "because"; I think this EF' hWi has come to be
an adverbial conjunction in its own right, much like hOTI its wide-ranging
usage as a conjunction derivative ultimately from a relative pronoun.
Other instances:
2 Cor 5:4 KAI GAR hOI ONTES EN TWi SKHNEI STENAZOMEN BAROUMENOI, EF' hWi OU
QELOMEN EKDUSASQAI ALL' EPENDUSASQAI, hINA KATAPOQHi TO QNHTON hUPO THS
ZWHS.
Phil 3:12 OUC hOTI HDH ELABON H HDH TETELEIWMAI, DIWKW DE EI KAI KATALABW,
EF' hWi KAI KATELHMFQHN hUPO CRISTOU [IHSOU].
Phil 4:10 ECARHN DE EN KURIWi MEGALWS hOTI HDH POTE ANEQALETE TO hUPER EMOU
FRONEIN, EF' hWi KAI EFRONEITE, HKAIREISQE DE.
--
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus)
Most months: 1647 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu OR cwconrad at ioa.com
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list