Case System

Joseph A. Weaks j.weaks at student.tcu.edu
Tue Feb 27 21:38:45 EST 2001


>...the arguments I use against assigning semantic significance to
>the Hellenistic Greek case forms.
>
>When you hear someone talking about the semantic force of the dative case
>(or any case) they will almost always end up inserting the phrase "from the
>context" toward the end of their discussion. What this little phrase tells
>us is that the case form in itself does not convey semantic information.

The logic here is flawed and the conclusion is folly.  Reference to 
context for the purpose of clarity does not demand that the case 
itself bares no semantic information.  Very often, we find synonymous 
structures where the only difference is case (are we describing the 
river... or listing its contents, etc.)
Using the above logic, I would have to conclude that words themselves 
convey no semantic relationships as well.  Consider even the silliest 
example,

Luke 11:7b
KAI TA PAIDIA MOU MET EMOU EIS THN KOITHN EISIN.

In painting the narrative/semantic picture, whether we're speaking of 
the master's slaves/servants or his little Alex and Christie (ie. his 
children), can only be determined by context. (Often the semantics of 
theologically important words rely so heavily on context, cf. 
EXOUSIA).

Suffice it to say that the importance of context does not negate that 
the morpheme or the case usage conveys semantic information.

Joe Weaks
Brite Divinity School, TCU
Fort Worth, Tx




More information about the B-Greek mailing list