PASAN THN PISTIN
Carlton Winbery
winberyc at speedgate.net
Thu Jan 18 20:49:13 EST 2001
Ivers wrote;
>
>How would you explain Acts 27:37: HMEQA DE hAI PASAI YUCAI EN TWi PLOIWi 276?
>An ALWAYS rule has no exceptions.
You are certainly correct concerning this construction as an attributive
use of PAS. I thought I had checked Accordance and it did not reveal this
exception. I went back and checked and I had used the wrong PAS in
Accordance. When I checked it properly I found two other exceptions in Acts.
Acts 19:7 OI PANTES ANDRES
Acts 20:18 TON PANTA CRONON
Acts 27:37 AI PASAI YUCA
Is it significant that all are in Acts?
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list