Rev 14:11 - EIS AIWNAS AIWNWN
Ben Crick
ben.crick at argonet.co.uk
Fri Jan 19 13:20:45 EST 2001
On Thu 18 Jan 2001 (22:03:55 +0100), d.roe at t-online.de wrote:
> What is the reason for this anomaly? I don't know of any change in the
> meaning of EIS AIWNAS AIWNWN due to its unique anarthrous plural form.
> Is there?
Dear David,
See my other post. As I noted there, the Hebrew sometimes has the definite
articles, and sometimes (more often) not. So the LXX has and has not; but
not systematically. IMHO, it has become a set-phrase Doxology. Compare the
Latin "per saecula saeculorum, Amen" formula, often recurring in the Latin
liturgy.
HTH
Ben
--
Revd Ben Crick, BA CF
<ben.crick at argonet.co.uk>
232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK)
http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list