Romans 4:1
c stirling bartholomew
cc.constantine at worldnet.att.net
Fri Jun 8 01:19:01 EDT 2001
on 6/7/01 9:51 PM, c stirling bartholomew wrote:
> C.E.B. Cranfield accepts the NA/UBS reading but he attaches KATA SARKA with
> hHMWN not TON PROPATORA. Cranfield's analysis really left me dumbfounded. I
> just don't get it. I would make both hHMWN and KATA SARKA limiting
> constituents attached to TON PROPATORA.
I think there is a better way of viewing this. Lets say that KATA SARKA
limits TON PROPATORA hHMWN as a unit, not TON PROPATORA or hHMWN. This may
be what Cranfield is driving at but it isn't what he said.
Clay
--
Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list