Romans 4:1

c stirling bartholomew cc.constantine at worldnet.att.net
Fri Jun 8 01:19:01 EDT 2001


on 6/7/01 9:51 PM, c stirling bartholomew wrote:

> C.E.B. Cranfield accepts the NA/UBS reading but he attaches KATA SARKA with
> hHMWN not TON PROPATORA.  Cranfield's analysis really left me dumbfounded. I
> just don't get it. I would make both hHMWN  and KATA SARKA limiting
> constituents attached to TON PROPATORA.

I think there is a better way of viewing this. Lets say that KATA SARKA
limits TON PROPATORA hHMWN as a unit, not TON PROPATORA or hHMWN. This may
be what Cranfield is driving at but it isn't what he said.

Clay
--  
Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062





More information about the B-Greek mailing list