forground & background, boundry markers -Longacre's Model

CWestf5155 at aol.com CWestf5155 at aol.com
Sat Nov 3 22:08:04 EST 2001


In a message dated 11/03/2001 1:15:08 PM Mountain Standard Time, 
doulos at merr.com writes:

> > 
>  > So all this is to say that marked formal features and even the general
>  > category of prominence make one contribution to a model of discourse
>  > structure that ought to be complex, and weigh in diverse other discourse
>  > features that contribute to textual cohesion, topic structure, co-text 
and
>  > context.
>  
>  I don't know very much about DA, but I do enjoy following these discussions
>  and learning from those who do. But I sometimes do not understand the
>  terminology. Could someone briefly explain for me the difference between
>  "foreground" and "frontground" and also between "co-text" and "context?"
>  -- 

Hi Steven,

Your questions are valid.  There's a lot of terminology floating around and 
it isn't used consistently.  My approach is consistent with Systemic 
Linguistics and the work that is being done by Porter and many of his 
associates.  

It is common to talk about levels of discourse being "background" and 
"foreground", which roughly corresponds to mainline and support material .

Porter expands the two-dimensional "background" and "foreground", adding 
"frontground"--frontground would be a prominent figure or point (so in my 
view background could be the setting, foreground could be the action line, 
and frontground the figure, climax or point of an episode).  This is a real 
improvement, but has its limitations. I like to talk about contouring. 

Co-text refers to the surrounding text, while context refers to 
situation/location of the text, author & recipients.

Cindy Westfall
Assistant Professor
Colorado Christian University



More information about the B-Greek mailing list