Lk 18:13; TWi hAMARTWLWi
Iver Larsen
iver_larsen at sil.org
Thu Nov 29 08:42:39 EST 2001
> Harry:
>
> One of the things I was trying to point out in my previous posts
> (apparently unsuccessfully) is that you have Wallace exactly backwards.
> He argues AGAINST the majority of translations, i.e., those that omit
> the English article in their translation of TWi hAMARTWLWi. He treats
> this verse under the category of par excellence and translates "O God,
> be merciful to me, THE sinner" (emphasis mine). The other alternatives
> he offers are "simple identification," which also in this case requires
> the article to be translated (since this takes the tax collector to be
> comparing himself with the Pharisee), or possibly well-known, which
> would require the translation of the article as well. In fact, he quotes
> Robertson approvingly where he criticizes the Canterbury revisers of the
> KJV for omitting the article here (see p. 208). Here Robertson maintains
> that omission of the article in translation of TWi hAMARTWLWi is
> inaccurate. Again, note carefully what Wallace says about TWi hAMARTWLWi
> in Luke 18.13:
>
> "Here the article is either *par excellence* or simple identification
> [or, *possibly* well-known]. If it is simple identification, this
> tax-collector is recognizing the presence of the Pharisee and is
> distinguishing himself from him by implying that, as far as he knew, the
> Pharisee was THE righteous one (between the two of them) and he was THE
> sinner. But if the article is *par excellence*, then the man is
> declaring that he is the worst of all sinners (from his perspective).
> This seems to fit well with the spirit of his prayer, for only the
> Pharisee explicitly makes a comparison with the other person present"
> (p. 223, emphasis his).
>
> So what Wallace says "fits well" with the spirit of the man's prayer is
> par excellence. That, after all, is why he puts this verse in that
> category to begin with! And if this is the case, the article must be
> translated, as Wallace indeed does.
> =============
Excuse me for not having a copy of Wallace. My question is: Does he
recognize the use of the Greek article which corresponds to a relative
pronoun in English? I had a discussion with Moon Ryul-Sung about this back
in January on this list.
To get a background for Lk 18:13, I tried to search for anarthrous nouns -
including pronouns - followed by an article in the same case as opposed to
being followed by a relative pronoun in the same case. So, I am trying to
compare two constructions which would be something like "X who is Y" and "X
the Y".
I found lots of anarthrous nominative nouns and pronouns preceding the
article as in
Matt 19:28 hUMEIS hOI AKOLOUQHSANTES MOI you who have followed me
but not a single instance with the relative pronoun instead of the article.
For the accusative I found two instances of the relative:
John 7:28 hO PEMYAS ME hON hUMEIS OUK OIDATE
but here the relative hON refers to a different person than the ME. (I think
this is significant, so keep it in mind.)
I found only a couple examples with the accusative article as in:
Rom 2:27 KRINEI hH EK FUSEWS AKROBUSTIA TON NOMON TELOUSA SE TON DIA
GRAMMATOS KAI PERITOMHS PARABATHN NOMOU the by birth uncircumcised who keep
the law will judge you who are a transgressor of law while having the
written (law) and circumcision
Eph 1:19 EIS hUMAS TOUS PISTEUONTAS to us who believe
For the genitive, I found several examples with the relative where as above
the relative refers to a different person than the immediately preceding
(pro)noun, e.g:
Mrk 1:7 ERCETAI hO ISCUROTEPOS MOU OPISW MOU hOU OUK EIMI hIKANOS KUYAS
LUSAI TON hIMANTA
There were also some examples of the genitive article functioning as English
relative, e.g.
John 9:18 EFWNHSAN TOUS GONOUS AUTOU TOU ANABLEYANTOS they called the
parents of him who had regained sight
For the dative case I found no examples with the relative pronoun but
several with the article functioning as an English pronoun. e.g.
Luk 1:36 KAI hOUTOS MHN hEKTOS ESTIN AUTHi THi KALOUMENHi STEIRAi
to her who is called barren
Luk 6:24 OUAI hUMIN TOIS PLOUSIOIS woe to you who are rich
Luk 11:42 OUAI hUMIN TOIS FARISAIOIS woe to you who are Pharisees
Luk 12:4 LEGW DE hUMIN TOIS FILOIS MOU I say to you who are my friends
?Luk 18:13 hILASQHTI MOI TWi hAMARTWLWi have mercy on me who am a sinner
Eph 3:8 EMOI TWi ELACISTOTERWi PANTWN hAGIWN EDOQH hH CARIS hAUTH
To me who is/was the least of all the saints was given this grace
I have limited the search to anarthrous nouns and pronouns. If I had
included arthrous nouns I would have found many more examples. (For this,
people may look at the archives for January where I gave examples with
arthrous nouns.)
My point is that the article can tie a description to a preceding noun or
pronoun in what is called a rankshifting relationship. It corresponds to the
function of the English pronoun and in Greek it seems to replace a pronoun
in these constructions. The Greek pronoun appears to be limited to cases
like John 7:28 above where the relative pronoun refers to a different person
than the preceding personal pronoun. If and when the article function as
what we would call a relative pronoun it does not have the normal attributes
of the article, and to discuss it in terms of attributes of the article is
somewhat misleading IMO.
Iver Larsen
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list