More parsing
c stirling bartholomew
cc.constantine at worldnet.att.net
Sat Apr 20 14:30:23 EDT 2002
on 4/20/02 9:10 AM, Daniel Riaño wrote:
> Dear BGreekers,
>
> I don't have any parsed text of the NT available, but I am curious to
> know how the authors parse the SN or SP that is placed formally in
> dependence of an article in attributive position (I would also like
> to know how do they parse the article and the resulting tree!), i.e.
> the SN or SP between the asterisks in:
>
> TO\ E)PI/BLHMA TO\ *A)PO\ TOU= KAINOU=* Eu.Luc.5.36
> H( PI/STIS H( *DI' AU)TOU=* Act.Ap.3.16
> TH\N A)NA/STASIN TH\N *E)K NEKRW=N* Act.Ap.4.1-2
>
> What I am interested in is not in the *tagging* of either the article
> or the dependent syntagmata, but the *parsing* of its constituents
> within the whole group. I imagine there is Chomskyan procedure to
> parse such sentences, and I'd like to know it too, but I am more
> interested in non-generative approaches. Does anybody know examples
> of not Indo-European languages with the same construction?
Daniel,
Nice question. Not the sort of thing one can just look up in BDF, Zerwick or
any of the lesser grammars.
Here are the texts:
LUKE 5:36 ELEGEN DE KAI PARABOLHN PROS AUTOUS hOTI OUDEIS EPIBLHMA APO
hIMATIOU KAINOU SCISAS EPIBALLEI EPI hIMATION PALAION: EI DE MH GE, KAI TO
KAINON SCISEI KAI TWi PALAIWi OU SUMFWNHSEI TO EPIBLHMA TO APO TOU KAINOU.
ACTS 3:16 KAI EPI THi PISTEI TOU ONOMATOS AUTOU TOUTON hON QEWREITE KAI
OIDATE, ESTEREWSEN TO ONOMA AUTOU, KAI hH PISTIS hH DI' AUTOU EDWKEN AUTWi
THN hOLOKLHRIAN TAUTHN APENANTI PANTWN hUMWN.
ACTS 4:1-2 LALOUNTWN DE AUTWN PROS TON LAON EPESTHSAN AUTOIS hOI hIEREIS KAI
hO STRATHGOS TOU hIEROU KAI hOI SADDOUKAIOI, DIAPONOUMENOI DIA TO DIDASKEIN
AUTOUS TON LAON KAI KATAGGELLEIN EN TWi IHSOU THN ANASTASIN THN EK NEKRWN,
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list